The Brief
We provided ecological support for the refurbishment and improvement of an existing three-storey educational facility in the Midlands. The proposals included demolition of part of the structure, installation of a new multi-use games area (MUGA), landscaping works, car park enhancements, tree maintenance and external building upgrades.
Planning permission was being sought for the redevelopment, and ecological input was required to inform the application and ensure compliance with protected species legislation, with particular focus on bats.
Our Role
We were commissioned to undertake a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA), incorporating an extended UK Habitat Classification survey and ecological desk study, alongside:
- Preliminary Roost Assessment (PRA) of buildings
- Preliminary Ground Level Roost Assessment of Trees (PGLRAT)
- Arboricultural survey, impact assessment and method statement (delivered by our in-house arboricultural team)
The PEA and PRA were delivered efficiently through coordinated site work, enabling planning timelines to be maintained.
Bat Survey Programme
During the PRA, Potential Roost Features (PRFs) were identified within two buildings scheduled for external works. As a result, we recommended further surveys to determine the presence or likely absence of roosting bats.
We subsequently delivered:
- Two dusk emergence surveys
- One dawn re-entry survey
- Use of infra-red cameras to support accurate observation
- Two surveyors per visit to ensure full coverage
No bat roosting activity was recorded during the surveys, allowing the project to proceed without the need for licensing.
Outcomes
- Combined PEA and PRA report
- Bat emergence and re-entry survey report
- Clear recommendations to support planning
- Reports issued and finalised within agreed deadlines
Our work provided the robust ecological evidence base required to support the planning application and redevelopment of the facility.
Project Management & Continuous Investment
During the project, tight timescales for follow-up bat surveys required rapid mobilisation of survey teams. The situation was promptly addressed, surveys were completed within the required seasonal window, and the project concluded successfully.
Key lessons included:
- Strengthening post-survey communication processes between surveyors and project managers
- Allocating protected project management time during periods of heavy site commitments
- Enhancing field data capture protocols to support efficient reporting
These improvements have since been embedded into team workflows to enhance future project delivery.
Practical, proportionate ecological advice supporting community infrastructure projects.
-
Derbyshire
